lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:57:24 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] An argument for Catena-2

Bill,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:33:43AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 03:32:04PM -0500, Bill Cox wrote:
> > I benchmarked Catena-2, and it is running 3.4X faster than Scrypt,
> > compared to 2.6X faster for Catena-3.
> 
> Why are Catena-2 and -3 faster than scrypt, in your benchmarks?

Oh, I guess you meant Catena with "the NoelKDF multiply hash", not one
of Christian's versions.  Then this could be so, for some thread count
to memory bandwidth ratios.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists