lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 11:00:25 -0500
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: A possible bandwidth limitation attack

If I were a government trying to crack Script or one of it's ancestors
that has a fast and efficient hardware implementation for the hash
function (such as pretty much all the ARX and SHA2 families), I'd
force a large DRAM maker to integrate the hashing core directly on the
chip for me, dramatically reducing the I/O bandwidth bottleneck.

DRAM chips support 16 gigabits per die, if I'm not mistaken.  That's
2GB per chip.  Any memory-hard KDF hashing less than 2GB is
susceptible to this bandwidth limitation attack.  We can expect this
to grow in the future, like by around 4X to 8GB per chip.  Since most
users will likely use smaller amounts of memory, I'd just replicate
the hashing core so that I'd have high bandwidth down as small as say
64MiB (or whatever the basic repeated DRAM block size is on the die),
which would allow parallel attacks on the die against these smaller
hashes.

I think this could only be done by large governments.  No one else
could force Samsung or Micron to let them muck with their cutting edge
products.  Doing a similar attack with lower integration chips is
possible through exotic 3D interconnect, but I'm not sure it would be
cost effective.

I think this is a another argument for compute-time hardening.  Feel
free to rely on multiplication chains in your hash function the way I
do.  I do one multiply followed by an XOR in a long chain to force an
attacker to take his time computing the hash, tying up the memory for
that long.  My code is at:

https://github.com/waywardgeek/tigerkdf

Bill

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ