lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:01:08 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Can I have two entries?

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:21:37PM -0400, Bill Cox wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Solar Designer <> wrote:
> > It's OK to make two submissions, but the reason you give is not good
> > enough for that, in my opinion.  Instead of making two submissions, can
> > you define TwoCats and SkinnyCat such that SkinnyCat can be computed
> > with TwoCats?  That way, SkinnyCat will be an implementation of a subset
> > of the functionality of TwoCats, and it can be part of the same
> > submission.  Just a cut-down implementation included in the submission,
> > and maybe also a second specification document for the cut-down version.
> >
> > That said, in case we'd happen to want to include SkinnyCat but not
> > TwoCats in the PHC portfolio, I'm not sure how we'd approach that if
> > it's not submitted separately.  I guess we'd ask you to package it
> > separately at that time.
> >
> > What do others think?
> >
> > Alexander
> Sounds good to me, though I still have work to do on TwoCats and the
> deadline is close!

If SkinnyCat is strictly a subset of TwoCats, I think you may add it
after the deadline, and not necessarily as part of your formal
submission.  This is my opinion, not an official position of the PHC panel.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists