phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFdfnBZQY6SOpM39CEPiH+LFuf3TTDx8uJVcVm+xsjKs-YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:08:13 +0200
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

You can let your IRC client connected and configure it so that it logs
all conversations of that channel. If you can't let a client running
on one of your machines, there exist services that can do it for you,
iirc.

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@...il.com> wrote:
> Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> writes:
>
>> Agree with Dmitry. Ideally submitters should be on the ML, and that's
>> their own responsibility to register and follow the PHC activity.
>
> On a similar note, can we get a bot /join'ed to #phc that will log
> discussion somewhere? I don't habitually hang out there, but it would be
> nice to have a log that I could grep for mentions of EARWORM.