lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:23:24 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] babbling about trends


Thomas Pornin (at Thursday, April 3, 2014, 7:48:08 PM):

> RAM _latency_, on the other hand, does not drop fast.

i'm not 100% well informed (=0% informed) about the differences
between cache and RAM.

but i dare to bold-guess that cache can grow to eventually eliminate
the need for anything else.

> and we must admit
> that parallelism has, for now, more slowly crept under the door than
> exploded.

i don't know about that, i'm not the NSA, and i have more than 200,
well okay, not cores, but pipelines in my pc. but that is what i see
in the future. CPUs don't have to be smart, we have smart compilers
instead. in fact, i believe compiler writers would thank for simpler
instruction set, so they could have simpler optimizers. so what if the
GPU approach eventually wins? i'm no expert though.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists