lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:38:26 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: Mechanical tests

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@...il.com> wrote:
> POMELO's submission document doesn't use the words "key derivation
> function", but it does claim collision resistance. But if you can find a
> sequence of inputs which causes the outputs to fails the
> diehard_birthdays test, then obviously you've reduced its collision
> resistance to at least something less than 2**(outlen/2) (for outlen
> expressed in bits). In this case, inputs of 0, 1, 2, 3... did the job.

In the case of POMELO, the output does not change base on the password
(due to a 2-line bug).  So, since people keep asking for demonstrated
input:

candidates> ./phs-pomelo -p one 1 1

1c a4 39 75 93 02 41 dc
15 f4 69 c1 55 1c b8 c0
a1 4a fd c2 e7 a3 e1 a8
e3 95 db 82 0c 97 26 d9      32 (octets)

candidates> ./phs-pomelo -p two 1 1

1c a4 39 75 93 02 41 dc
15 f4 69 c1 55 1c b8 c0
a1 4a fd c2 e7 a3 e1 a8
e3 95 db 82 0c 97 26 d9      32 (octets)

The two line fix to lines 47 and 48, so that the salt does not
overwrite the password, makes dieharder happy with POMELO output.

Bill

Powered by blists - more mailing lists