phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Quick gripe... in case there's ever another contest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29185.1396719690@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:41:30 +0000
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@....freebsd.dk>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Quick gripe... in case there's ever another contest

In message <CAOLP8p4Sq6qwP+QXA9XROb=7QO4Of=vY7gdP-hOQW=7RpEQ6hQ@...l.gmail.com>
, Bill Cox writes:

>I'm having fun compiling all the various schemes, but I have had to
>hand-modify most of them to get them to be compatible with my main.c.
>It's no biggie, but a bit of a pain.  If you guys influence future
>competitions, could you please include a main.c and possibly even an
>example project that successfully builds using it?  Maybe we should
>have required linux compatible makefiles, and that make PHS generate
>an executable using the shared main.c file?

Yes, I was a bit disappointed about the non-functionality of
the submissions.

Please share any patches you have to make things more functional,
then I'll apply them to the github project to save time for
others.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@...eBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.