phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] gambit wiki strength

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOLP8p5SXn4wWyttjrAxFyuo1qKgY3Ox7NsU9MQyzzN++mgtLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:01:39 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] gambit wiki strength

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Thomas Pornin <pornin@...et.org> wrote:

> Anyway, I think that if you want to be useful and feel like you could
> write entries into the Wiki, then by all means go for it. Especially if
> you want to fill out empty entries. A Wiki works on the assumption that
> most writers are honest and well-meaning, and that some surveillance
> (e.g. by the PHC Panel people) is sufficient to maintain order. If other
> people are not happy with your edits, then they can fix them in any way
> as they see fit. It _may_ be that this degenerates into local edit wars,
> which would then warrant some mighty smiting from the Panel, but I am an
> Optimist and I believe that we should give cooperation a chance.
>
>
>         --Thomas Pornin
>

I think I'm already seeing that my writing isn't going to be particularly
helpful for the wiki.  I'll stick to the the discussion list for that.

Bill

Content of type "text/html" skipped