lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:28:22 -0400
From: Bill Cox <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] gambit wiki strength

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Thomas Pornin <> wrote:

> Anyway, I think that if you want to be useful and feel like you could
> write entries into the Wiki, then by all means go for it. Especially if
> you want to fill out empty entries. A Wiki works on the assumption that
> most writers are honest and well-meaning, and that some surveillance
> (e.g. by the PHC Panel people) is sufficient to maintain order. If other
> people are not happy with your edits, then they can fix them in any way
> as they see fit. It _may_ be that this degenerates into local edit wars,
> which would then warrant some mighty smiting from the Panel, but I am an
> Optimist and I believe that we should give cooperation a chance.
>         --Thomas Pornin

I went ahead and filled out strength bullets for TwoCats (without the link
to the adorable cats).  Please edit them as needed, as my skills here are
terrible.  I figure I'll just butcher my own page :-)


Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists