[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <234496419.20140414085342@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:53:42 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: gambit wiki strength
this appeared on the wiki
> Simplifies password hashing with SHA3 sponge construction
which i don't fully understand, but for sure it is not precise,
because gambit doesn't use SHA3. SHA3 is in the draft, but most likely
it will contain 4 SHA variants, and 2 SHAKEs, but none of those match
the capacity/padding choice in gambit document/sample source, and none
of those allow duplexing, which is a necessity. rather, gambit shares
crypto core (keccak) with SHAs and SHAKEs. thus i would use keccak in
the cited sentence (but i still don't understand it).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists