phc-discussions - Re: A review per day

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5404CCB1.90506@ciphershed.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:44:49 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: A review per day - POMELO

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/01/2014 03:39 PM, Bill Cox wrote:
> The author says that in calling these ARX (ADD/ROTATE/XOR) so many 
> times compared to respected cryptographic hash functions, that the 
> data should be more than adequately scrambled.  He think he is 
> probably right.

I meant to say I think he is probably right :-)

Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=47ti
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----