lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:27:19 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <>
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] A review per day - Schvrch

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Bill Cox <> wrote:
> I am doing a *lot* of attacking PHC
> candidates right now, I personally would appreciate input checking, so
> I don't waste time showing that an entry is weak against invalid
> inputs.

that is why i have asserts. they mainly serve documentation purposes.
however, it was not a requirement to provide self documenting
implementation. the submitted documentation should serve as a
reference. of course, self documenting code is nice to have.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists