[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54078A17.1030300@ciphershed.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:37:27 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Cryptographically strong salt is not overkill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I just started poking into the Makwa code. I'm still not sure if I'm
qualified to review it, but I can always comment on code. I saw the
following comment:
/*
* A cryptographically strong PRNG is kinda overkill for a salt,
* but it does not hurt to use one.
*/
This is not true!
If any salt generator that produces data that is distinguishable from
random data makes it into CipherShed, I will be pretty pissed off.
Don't forget that some users have a valid need to store the salt in
plain-text without letting an attacker know that it is in fact not
just random data.
This is a critical feature for both stenography and plausible
deniability. Detectable salt would destroy the hidden volume feature
CipheShed inherits from TrueCrypt.
That said, I haven't reviewed the CipherShed code yet like I'm
reviewing this code...
Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=xf/3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists