phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98F++x+A_0c0r7OV=ZQWebx4rcGNdwvD3sNjcrhCuoC9uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:03:36 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> I am not sure how to respond to papers like this that look
> professional,

easy. you exclude opinion and adjectives. you include only logical
arguments and facts.