lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:46:10 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <>
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Dmitry Khovratovich
<> wrote:

one more question/observation: i don't understand the reason for
gambit's basic crypto being "claimed" as opposed to "explored", since
it inherits these properties from the underlying sponge, in the
proposed instance, keccak. what other exploration is needed?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists