phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98FevYdyqUnnq+m+TjDEBPPzSzy8KHXPdad0_KMNsyQXhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:12:02 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

i'm kind of hoping this attitude will not become the new norm on this
forum. not unexpected though, but could be contained.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org> wrote:
>  However, I'm happy to debunk more of these dumb ratings he keeps making.