phc-discussions - Re: Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5469CDE9.2070001@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:28:57 +0100
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests

On 11/10/2014 09:22 AM, Milan Broz wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I run some simple tests with almost all PHC candidates
> (plus Catena2 and RIG2 submitted here).
> 
> Maybe it could be useful, it is in fact it is kind of an independent extension
> what Bill Cox sent here for reviews.
> 
> The long description with pictures here
>   http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/mbroz/PHCtest/blob/master/output/index.html

I updated test (according to discussion here) - see URL link above
 - added Gambit to fixed mcost/tcost tests
 - fixed Catena/Catena2 API hashlen bug
 - run Catena with lambda (tcost) > 0
 - fixed some notes & graphs
 - Lyra2 crashes (segfault) if output hash length is longer that 191 bytes
   (probably just another parameter checking bug; missed this in previous version).

(If you have any ideas for possible automatic testing of 2nd round candidates please let me know.)

Thanks,
Milan