phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Overview of PHC Candidates and Garbage-Collector Attacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <546E0713.2050003@uni-weimar.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:21:55 +0100
From: Jakob Wenzel <jakob.wenzel@...-weimar.de>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Overview of PHC Candidates and Garbage-Collector Attacks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

I just detected two flaws in the classification of the PHC candidates
regarding to the resistance against (W)GC attacks.

1) mcs_phs actually provides both kinds of resistance
2) parallel is vulnerable against WGC attacks

This was already descsribed in the text, but Table 3 stated otherwise.
A corrected version is already on ePrint.

https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/881.pdf

Best regards,
Jakob

- -- 
Jakob Wenzel
Research Assistant
Chair of Media Security (Prof. Lucks)
Bauhausstraße 11 (Room 217)
99423 Weimar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUbgcPAAoJEDFlRQsgEDnDns8H/1RZXNO/sb5ewXzFHP8jwPKL
a1BYylqkHx9r1FBPJrtz15cZp77Wh1WHs4N4Wa9RQsi8RHnBfA4ZygnDtPYboANz
DvTQS/HEFjDxRekpQQKhYpxtAFOxflL+Yuc6CRRPGyX0geXgtuVlhQGa80TaBUbR
/BuC22ZeG7vHWQIbSonxNDMxICVXZQVxFgLb+xKHerUxNgOjTg+hX5xodZpuhexm
Y31ERrXmSuTJzIWm6nrc/yJJe67RsYvl7VYXTL50lcWecSG+RtkTRxosHgNeTsvt
R29CjcG5vQQMuDASu88Eg8Zmy2QcPFWxkdGStiQPWRiYrvd9LnUqIW/k3FhmSvg=
=WwFt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----