lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:56:45 +0000
From: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>
To: "' (discussions@...sword-hashing.net)'" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: How important is salting really?

Password security researchers learn more and more from data breaches seemingly every week. Dictionaries and candidate generation algorithms get better all the time. So here's a question. Maybe the answer has changed over the last few years and we should revisit our assumptions.

Two different people independently choose this same password. It could be "ilovecats" or it could be something less obvious.

What is the probability that this password will not be in attackers' dictionaries or it will be hard to crack?

(If this chance is small, then what do we gain by salting?)


-          Marsh


Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists