lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 02:59:47 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

Jean-Philippe Aumasson <> writes:

>Should the "standardization phase" be public (thus after selection and
>announcing winners) or not (thus by panel members only, after selecting but
>before announcing winners)?

I don't think it needs to be public, I'm hoping none of it's that
controversial since most of it is fairly straightforward (define an ID for
OpenPGP, and OID for CMS/SMIME, etc), and in any case there's more than enough
panel members to do a design-by-comittee if we need it :-).


Powered by blists - more mailing lists