phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1YTsn5-0002Jg-9i@login01.fos.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 02:59:47 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@...auckland.ac.nz>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> writes:

>Should the "standardization phase" be public (thus after selection and
>announcing winners) or not (thus by panel members only, after selecting but
>before announcing winners)?

I don't think it needs to be public, I'm hoping none of it's that
controversial since most of it is fairly straightforward (define an ID for
OpenPGP, and OID for CMS/SMIME, etc), and in any case there's more than enough
panel members to do a design-by-comittee if we need it :-).

Peter.