phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98Eaf-qiY6VDKyHt8Kt6shA16TtcBX_4FE1-FUTX-Cj5kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 15:45:14 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson
<jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:
> Should it be public, a risk is that it degenerates into CFRG-like
> bikeshedding...

how exactly a private discussion promotes the lack of bikeshedding?
this attitude puzzles me. why do you think anybody will accept what
you say, just because you say so? this would be an appeal to
authority, except you don't even have the authority to appeal to.