phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFdfVBqPS2zggJaNK5ezDQZpy1-ABv8ad_muX4_Z9_6ozmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 15:53:36 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson
> <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:
>> Should it be public, a risk is that it degenerates into CFRG-like
>> bikeshedding...
>
> how exactly a private discussion promotes the lack of bikeshedding?
> this attitude puzzles me. why do you think anybody will accept what
> you say, just because you say so? this would be an appeal to
> authority, except you don't even have the authority to appeal to.

Based on my experience, fewer people => less bikeshedding, but I might be wrong.

"Rudeness is a weak man’s imitation of strength." (George Orwell)