phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMtf1Hsn1=zatL+9xnQ9mhYPBve37=nuBo=N3ZCYNK3EJ_vRNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 23:13:31 +0800
From: Ben Harris <mail@...rr.is>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

On 06/03/2015 10:54 pm, "Jean-Philippe Aumasson" <
jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Based on my experience, fewer people => less bikeshedding, but I might be
wrong.
>

I'd think that past experience with the phase 1 report has shown that the
panel members are busy people. A public discussion that can be summarised
and given to the panel members seems the best use of resources.

Content of type "text/html" skipped