lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGiyFdfCGBa3gMSBeaqUwq7OT3KzuBuXwWGR+-DPR1mqkHzP=g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:20:21 +0100 From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics > I'd think that past experience with the phase 1 report has shown that the > panel members are busy people. A public discussion that can be summarised > and given to the panel members seems the best use of resources. Yeah, crowdsourcing is probably the way to go. FTR, I personally lean towards a public process.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists