phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFdfCGBa3gMSBeaqUwq7OT3KzuBuXwWGR+-DPR1mqkHzP=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:20:21 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics

> I'd think that past experience with the phase 1 report has shown that the
> panel members are busy people. A public discussion that can be summarised
> and given to the panel members seems the best use of resources.

Yeah, crowdsourcing is probably the way to go. FTR, I personally lean
towards a public process.