lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55236F42.8060405@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 07:46:42 +0200 From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] Updated tests document On 04/06/2015 11:17 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > Milan, > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: >> It would be very nice to test also parallel attribute but then functions should >> export some unified interface. >> If it is not too late, maybe addinng m_parallel to PHS() as a tweak... > > I know it's not right for your use case, but for password hashing on a > server the parallelism would be external to PHS(), so maybe you can > simply have your own wrapper start multiple independent threads, for > independent password hashes computed with their own PHS() calls? And > provide a chart showing throughput in requests/second vs. memory usage > (e.g. 128 KB to 128 MB), at the lowest supported t_cost and the maximum > number of concurrent threads supported in hardware (e.g. 8 on a > currently typical quad-core CPU). I'd find such results helpful. Hi Alexander, I can try but I am quite busy this week so cannot promise anything soon... Thanks, Milan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists