phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Competition process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98GPSB4FqVXBXpS6+8xCNWbn8v_vJ_yc7A9NwKRXH1+oOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:14:11 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Competition process

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson
<jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:
> Earlier in January the panel agreed that Argon2 was too major a change
> to be accepted as a "tweak".

was there a similar conversation about new catena versions? how does
that case differ from argon?