lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+hr98GPSB4FqVXBXpS6+8xCNWbn8v_vJ_yc7A9NwKRXH1+oOQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:14:11 +0200 From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com> To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net> Subject: Re: [PHC] Competition process On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote: > Earlier in January the panel agreed that Argon2 was too major a change > to be accepted as a "tweak". was there a similar conversation about new catena versions? how does that case differ from argon?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists