lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:14:11 +0800
From:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC:	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <james.morse@....com>,
	<gabriel.fernandez@...com>, <Minghuan.Lian@...escale.com>,
	<wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>, <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
	<arnd@...db.de>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>, <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: PCIe regression with DRA7xx in 4.4-rc1



On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:31:07 +0530
Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm seeing a regression with <d1b9cf31252e905ad563b9e863fd4470f6c3dd1c>("PCI:
> designware: Make driver arch-agnostic").
> 
> Logs using a SATA PCIe card [1]. The PCIe card enumerates fine but after that I
> observe "ata3.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec), ata3.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O
> error, err_mask=0x4)"
> 
> Logs using a Ethenet PCIe card [2]. Again here the PCIe card enumerates fine
> but when I give ifconfig up, it fails.
> 
> If I just revert commit <d1b9cf31252e905ad563b9e863fd4470f6c3dd1c>, the PCIe
> cards starts to work fine again

FYI, maybe the patch can fix the regression.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-November/387362.html

> 
> Logs using a SATA PCIe card [3]. Here the KINGSTON SSD gets detected fine.
> Logs using a Ethernet PCIe card [4]. I'm able to do ping tests now.
> 
> Actually I'm not able to find any obvious problems with the patch and the irq
> number and the memory resource also looks fine. Any idea what could be the problem?
> 
> [1] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/13491456/
> [2] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/13491526/
> 
> [3] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/13491658/
> [4] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/13491593/
> 
> Thanks
> Kishon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ