bugtraq - Re: Medium security hole affecting DSL-G624T

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705032250.42161.timb@nth-dimension.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:50:40 +0100
From: Tim Brown <timb@...-dimension.org.uk>
To: 3APA3A <3APA3A@...urity.nnov.ru>
Cc: news@...uriteam.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Medium security hole affecting DSL-G624T

On Thursday 03 May 2007 22:13:15 3APA3A wrote:

> This  vulnerability  for  D-Link  DSL-G624T was already reported by Jose
> Ramon Palanco. See
>
> http://securityvulns.ru/Odocument816.html
>
> Previously, same problem was reported for D-Link DSL-G604T by Qex
>
> http://securityvulns.ru/Mdocument578.html
>
>
> There were also few more problems reported about /cgi-bin/webcm, see
>
> http://securityvulns.ru/Idocument664.html
> http://securityvulns.ru/Idocument759.html

I quite agree, the Summary of my attached advisory makes this point.  However, 
as I also point out in the Solutions section, all of the issues you list were 
against major version 1 of the firmware.  We're now at major version 3 and 
directory traversal is still a problem.  Moreover, the advisories that cover 
directory traversal (http://securityvulns.ru/Mdocument578.html and 
http://securityvulns.ru/Mdocument578.html) only talk about /etc/passwd.  
Neglecting the fact that the web server runs as root and that /etc/shadow is 
therefore available.

Secondly, the Javascript injection issue describe is as far as I 
know /entirely new/.  It's not a short walk to the point where these two 
issues alone could be use to compromise devices, irrespective of the firmware 
issues you also link to.

Maybe, I'm hoping that by version 10 of the firmware in the year 2014, D-Link 
may actually manage to fix some of these reported problems?  Moreover, maybe 
they'll actually make it possible for researchers to report these things in a 
manner whereby they actually respond to the reports when contacted.  Not 
holding my breath though.

Tim
-- 
Tim Brown
<mailto:timb@...-dimension.org.uk>
<http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/>