full-disclosure - Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00a001c3a247$04fbbb90$391afea9@corp.ad.timeinc.com>
From: jlevitsk at joshie.com (Joshua Levitsky)
Subject: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <esm@...ic.net>
To: "Joshua Levitsky" <jlevitsk@...hie.com>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning

> Were you a customer? Was Red Hat actually deriving any revenue from the
> machines you were running Red Hat Linux on besides a trickle of money
> for Red Hat Network subscriptions? If not, why do you think they should
> be concerned about what you run now?

$300 a year for my up2date subscriptions. So yes. They were on my 5 boxes.
$300/year when all I need is up2date access for patches seems like they
could make a profit off me. Also I do consulting for many companies, and in
every case I would tell them to use up2date.

> And how does this have anything to do with full-disclosure? You might
> want to take discussions like this to an appropriate Red Hat mailing
> list, not a security discussion list.

Because as of December there will be no security fixes for RH 7.x / 8.x so
it is as on topic as some of the other stuff on this list.

-Josh