full-disclosure - Is Mozilla's "patch" enough?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040712154207.GA8044@sivokote.iziade.m$>
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: Is Mozilla's "patch" enough?

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:23:29PM +0300, Aviv Raff wrote:
> 
> I understand that if an attacker has the ability to change the user.js
> file he can do worse things, but why should there be a way to override
> security patches without uninstalling them?
>

if you understand your dumbness why do you continue to polute the list?
updated builds for the so called "os" are available at mozilla.org - go get
them.
there are a lot of ways to override security patches without uninstalling them

georgi