full-disclosure - Re: Re: in-line coax monitoring device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0509271758270.30910-100000@kegger.national-security.net>
Date: Wed Sep 28 02:23:28 2005
From: fd at ew.nsci.us (fd@...nsci.us)
Subject: Re: Re: in-line coax monitoring device

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Dave Korn wrote:

> > "Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway@...mail.com> wrote:
> >>> From: Alex Krycek
> >>
> >>> =C4=EE=E1=F0=FB=E9 =E2=E5=F7=E5=F0...looking for an in-line coax moni=
toring device that
> >>> will give me the ability to monitor/capture and decode all traffic
> >>
> >>   The device you are looking for does exist.  It's called a "cable
> >>   modem".
> >
> > Even simpler: it's the T-shaped BNC coax adapter you use to connect a P=
C
> > to the coax network.
>=20
>   No it isn't.  Do you really think it's possible to broadcast two hundre=
d
> channels of video plus supply broadband IP access to a couple of hundred
> people over a single 10Mb/s 10-BASE-T ethernet line of the kind that has
> been obsolete for the best part of a decade?

Yeah, that and BNC is much different than RG58 ...

>=20
>   That's not an ethernet on that wire.
>=20
>     cheers,
>       DaveK
>=20

--=20
Eric Wheeler
Vice President
National Security Concepts, Inc.
PO Box 3567
Tualatin, OR 97062

http://www.nsci.us/
Voice: (503) 293-7656
Fax:   (503) 885-0770