[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e024ccca0512181941u1a4bdf07n2fd9a7da4e2a9880@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon Dec 19 03:41:53 2005
From: dudevanwinkle at gmail.com (Dude VanWinkle)
Subject: [Clips] A small editorial about recent events.
(fwd)
On 12/18/05, Andrew A <gluttony@...il.com> wrote:
> Trends like these will continue to worsen until someone performs a coup.
> Luckily, it has been suprisingly easy throughout history to do so. All that
> is needed is for someone with the will to walk up and seize power. Were
> someone to perform an operation like this, the board members of Halliburton
> and other companies close to the current administration should probably be
> simultaneously struck to send an effective message.
Well, not all Coup's have to be bloody. I would be perfectly happy
with a bloodless coup (or even a sporty one)
The problem lies with the fact that most military persons (that I have
met, especially ones that have not _seen_ combat) follow the
"commander in chief" blindly (well unless they get a BJ), so any
bloodless coup would be met by a very bloody retribution.
-JP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists