full-disclosure - Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <drdstc$e8i$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date: Fri Jan 27 19:39:46 2006
From: davek_throwaway at hotmail.com (Dave Korn)
Subject: Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home

Ivan . wrote:
>>   Without seeing the content of these packets, I don't see how
>> Cringely can claim to know whether there's anything spyware or not
>> about it.
>
> It should be up to zonealarm to prove that it isn't spyware, don't you
> think?

  Have you stopped beating your wife yet?  (It should be up to *you* to 
_prove_ that you don't beat her, don't you think?)

  Once you've done that, prove you've stopped beating your dad too.

  Then prove you no longer molest penguins in dark alleyways late at night.

  BTW, can you prove you aren't a thief?

> Shouldn't they do everything they can to alley the fears of
> their customers?

  No.  I don't believe there is a duty on anyone to respond to the 
fabrications and fantasies of liars, kooks and delusional confabulators. 
These people are making massive claims with zero evidence.  The burden of 
proof lies on the accuser.

    cheers,
       DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....