full-disclosure - Re: on xss and its technical merit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:50:41 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Byron Sonne <blsonne@...ers.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: on xss and its technical merit

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:23:15 EST, Byron Sonne said:

> That's a disingenuous distortion. I happen to think they are both viable
> attack vectors AND rubbish.

The sad part is that in so many cases, total rubbish is a viable attack vector.

I'm ambivalent on whether the preceding sentence needs a smiley or not...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/