| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:18:37 -0700 From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb@...neit.net> To: "ghost" <ghosts@...il.com>, "Paul Schmehl" <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Just Asking >-----Original Message----- >From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure- >bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of ghost >Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 5:29 PM >To: Paul Schmehl >Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk >Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Just Asking > >and yet still, none of what you posted has anything to do with Dan >commencing in questionable activities. > > [TLB:] And none of what you posted represents the least actionable proof that he did. A text file, posted by self-professed Cyber-Criminals, is not evidence of any sort that can be acted on to deprive someone of professional certification. At least, not in those parts of the world where we have the rule of law, standards of evidence, and other such things that make commerce work. The supposed victim of Dan's unauthorized network analysis would have to complain to ISC2, with proper evidence, and proper chain of custody and non-repudiation of said evidence, before any action could even begin. Instead of advocating the rescission Dan's CISSP, you should study the material and go get your own. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists