[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110613065701.GB2227@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:57:01 +0300
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
To: Bruce Ediger <bediger@...atigery.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Absolute Sownage (A concise history of recent
Sony hacks)
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:06:33AM -0600, Bruce Ediger wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
>
> > Nowadays the big, noisy, obvious, "own the net" type "outbreak" of
> > yesteryear is not the model of choice for your typical cyber-thug (you
> > know, those running virtually all malware these days)..
> >
> > In fact, _avoiding_ exactly that is pretty much top of their list of
> > desiderata.
>
> How do we know this?
>
> I mean, it seems kind of circular to say "We haven't seen another Code
> Red II for a while, so the malware writers are doing other things." Of
> course they are off doing other things: we haven't seen another Code Red
> II in years.
>
> What other evidence exists?
>
Some evidence:
Conficker was long ago in the past 2008.
i heard script kiddie mentality changed so much they prefer to brag about XSS instead of pwning the interwebs :)
stuxnet didn't target the interwebs either - this might mean Valdis'
constant is more like 95.999%.
strongly suspect all the 404 for cgis in my httpd logs are requested by
hand :)
--
joro
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists