lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E95CF4D.7060208@madirish.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:33:01 -0400
From: Justin Klein Keane <justin@...irish.net>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Search and Seizure of Email

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'll just leave this here:

http://www.cybercrime.gov/ssmanual/03ssma.html

Section D does list a search warrant, but also lists other mechanisms
by which the government can compel a provider to turn over e-mail.
The US government is restricted by the 4th amendment in this respect.

Justin Klein Keane
http://www.MadIrish.net

The digital signature on this e-mail may be confirmed using the
PGP key located at: http://www.madirish.net/gpgkey

On 10/12/2011 11:54 AM, Laurelai wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 10:33 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>> Well said!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Sichel 
>> <daniels@...derosatel.com <mailto:daniels@...derosatel.com>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> In fact, law enforcement officials don?t even need a search
>> warrant to
>>> access private emails.
>> 
>> In point of fact, nobody does, although acquiring this access is 
>> clearly easier for law enforcement. One of the burdens that the
>> freedom the Internet brings, is the freedom. Your email is out
>> there, typically unencrypted, available to anyone who can snatch
>> the packets off the wire, Any ISP employee with appropriate read
>> rights on a mail server.
>> 
>> Take responsibility for your own email. Encrypt it if you must, 
>> but for heaven sakes, own the fact that it is publicly visible.
>> 
>> If we do not take responsibility for our own email and whine
>> about others reading it,  than there will HAVE to be regulations
>> by government to protect us. That's what government does.  That's
>> what it is SUPPOSED to do.  So before we invite Godzilla to
>> protect our email, how about we just man up and take
>> responsibility ourselves?
>> 
>> But that's just the idea of a bunch of dead white guys like
>> Edmund Burke, John Adams and James Madison, and what do they
>> know?
>> 
>> 
>> Dan Sichel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure -
>> We believe in it. Charter:
>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and
>> sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure -
>> We believe in it. Charter:
>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and
>> sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> Well there is no push to make snail-mail encrypted and lets face it
> most peoples mailboxes don't have any sort of locking mechanisms
> and is available to anyone with two hands and the malicious intent
> to steal someones mail  however the US Gov needs a warrant to
> intercept your physical mail, why does it being online somehow make
> it different? Especially considering the US Postal service keeps
> threatening to shut down, and this is due to the increased
> popularity of *email*. Why this should be troubling is that they
> consider email somehow different than physical mail when it comes
> to privacy rights for no really good reason, and considering that
> one of the grievances we had with England in the time of the
> revolutionary war was the government intercepting mail for 
> arbitrary reasons. This should make every American citizen's hair
> stand on end.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure -
> We believe in it. Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and
> sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iPwEAQECAAYFAk6Vz00ACgkQkSlsbLsN1gAJnwb/QrMq+0QrJMggMZELaP/VWC2D
4+a3Dt+3J64pkW10JIQVM9yZkUMxLoUNfx3QldB/e9JKTvYRhjx4eJTphMIc/+S1
Fp+P297KH3HsyVyCtultio/bqNTmmcBE6ttVYbib25qO+Uey/p63HoSiuQsUi6vr
PIIxfNXSqk9+Ky147+anp9HhkjjPhfW7WDih4ITNeHZ3izbW6tkFGgMjQb5kUCEc
Y7j1rAECjVOXX6/SG3+JwvdiSgfs6WEXKgBrtZGpQdpyh2DfH3ycT3a/8L+PBI0q
94RBIO3mMO+NuIWUEIQ=
=jkDU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ