full-disclosure - Re: [OT] Obama said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJtJjZsNZFO1yZNdOXFk=h+2QM0NhPaJASHLAXL-1fpBWEFODA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:26:12 +0100
From: Darren Martyn <d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com>
To: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@...il.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [OT] Obama said: "American people understand
 that not everybody's been following the rules"

...And what, exactly, gave the US the right to be there in the first place?
Non existant WMD? Human rights? The US has to stop seeing themselves as
international police.

/ends miniature rant

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@...il.com>wrote:

> Obviously not.
>
> Again.  They looked like they had weapons.  The pilots weren't
> wondering...they were sure they saw weapons.
>
> They then engaged what appeared to be a clear threat to other US
> forces nearby.
>
> The pilots acted exactly as they should have, given the information
> presented to them.  This was a war zone, not a country club.
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@...il.com>
> wrote:
> >> Except that they weren't obviously unarmed.
> >>
> >> Not only where they not obviously unarmed, they appeared to be armed.
> >>
> >> Look at the 4 minute mark.
> >>
> >> That sure as shit looks like an RPG.
> >>
> >> The crew thought the group was armed.  Ergo, they were cleared to
> engage.
> >>
> >> This wasn't a war crime...and the allegation that it was just makes
> >> people look ridiculous.
> > Listen to yourself: we weren't sure if they were armed, so we killed
> > them. Put yourself and your family in the shoes of the dead folks. Its
> > not a comfortable place to be, is it?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:44 PDT, Mike Hale said:
> >>>> Seriously!  Think about the injustice of having American helicopters
> >>>> engage armed individuals shadowing American soldiers.
> >>>
> >>> Shooting at "armed individuals" is one thing.  If it's "civilians and
> Reuters
> >>> employees" who *aren't* obviously armed, it's something else.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/