[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111004233704.GB21205@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 01:37:04 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2/xattr_security.c: local functions should be static
On Fri 23-09-11 13:51:24, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> This quiets the sparse noise:
>
> warning: symbol 'ext2_initxattrs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Hmm, this patch doesn't seem to be against latest Linus kernel... At
least I don't see ext2_initxattrs() there - although I remember seeing
patches adding this function flying somewhere.
Honza
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/xattr_security.c b/fs/ext2/xattr_security.c
> index c922adc..ed1a5d5 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/xattr_security.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/xattr_security.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ ext2_xattr_security_set(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
> value, size, flags);
> }
>
> -int ext2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array,
> +static int ext2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array,
> void *fs_info)
> {
> const struct xattr *xattr;
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists