[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVV36z4UZaL/vOBI@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:40:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>,
"Kenta.Tada@...y.com" <Kenta.Tada@...y.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Michael Weiß
<michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@...sung.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] wchan: Fix ORC support and leaky fallback
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 06:01:57PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> - Should we use a similar sched wrapper for /proc/$pid/stack to make its
> raciness go away?
Alternatively, can we make /stack go away? AFAICT the semantics of that
are far worse in that it wants the actual kernel stack of a task,
blocked or not, which is a total pain in the arse (not to mention a
giant infoleak and side-channel).
> - At the risk of triggering a much larger patch set, I suspect
> get_wchan() can be made generic ;-) It's just a glorified wrapper
> around stack_trace_save_tsk().
Done that for you :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists