[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153855056.6508.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:17:35 -0400
From: Adam Belay <abelay@...ell.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [patch] [resend] Fix swsusp with PNP BIOS
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 09:23 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 07:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 24 July 2006 20:28, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > swsusp is unable to suspend my machine (DTK FortisPro TOP-5A notebook)
> > > with kernel 2.6.17.5 because it's unable to suspend PNP device 00:16
> > > (mouse).
> > >
> > > The problem is in PNP BIOS. pnp_bus_suspend() calls pnp_stop_dev() for
> > > the device if the device can be disabled according to pnp_can_disable().
> > > The problem is that pnpbios_disable_resources() returns -EPERM if the
> > > device is not dynamic (!pnpbios_is_dynamic()) but insert_device() happily
> > > sets PNP_DISABLE capability/flag even if the device is not dynamic. So we
> > > try to disable non-dynamic devices which will fail.
> > > This patch prevents insert_device() from setting PNP_DISABLE if the
> > > device is not dynamic and fixes suspend on my system.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > Pavel, what do you think?
>
> Adam is probably a better person to ask. (Added to cc).
I appreciate it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nigel
The patch looks good. Maybe we should even do this check for
PNP_CONFIGURABLE.
Thanks,
Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists