linux-kernel - Re: Re: [patch 6/6] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060908070011.GA8889@miraclelinux.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:00:11 +0800
From:	Akinobu Mita <mita@...aclelinux.com>
To:	Don Mullis <dwm@...r.net>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [patch 6/6] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities

On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:29:57PM -0700, Don Mullis wrote:

> 1) Reorder kernel command line args alphabetically -- lets
> output of `ls /debug/failslab` serve as a handy reminder
> of the arg bindings.
> 
> 2) Rename a variable to agree with the /debug file name.

Yes. this kernel command line was confusing.
This change makes it better.

Now I'm writing the filter which allow failing only for a specific
module by using unwinding kernel stacks API.

Then I'll send next version with your fixes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/