[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4005.1158166252@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:50:52 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...l.org,
akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Implement a general log2 facility in the kernel
Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> > This facility provides three entry points:
> >
> > log2() Log base 2 of u32
> > ll_log2() Log base 2 of u64
> > long_log2() Log base 2 of unsigned long
>
> The names are rather counter-intuitive. "ll" sounds like "long long", so
> why does it opearte on *unsigned* 64-bit? Ditto for "long_log2()".
> Perhaps they should be log2_u32(), log2_u64(), etc.
Well, given that you can't represent a log of a negative number, I'm not sure
it matters.
Note that long_log2() already exists and is of arch-dependent size.
> Even better if someone can come up with the right pre-processor magic
> using sizeof/typeof so that you could just use "log2(any type)"
I then end up with 32 of these per usage if I pass in a definite 32-bit value:
warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
because of the:
n >= (1ULL << 63) ? 63 : \
n >= (1ULL << 62) ? 62 : \
n >= (1ULL << 61) ? 61 : \
...
in ll_log2().
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists