[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4143.1158166615@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:56:55 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...l.org,
akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Implement a general log2 facility in the kernel
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Therefore, re-using "log2()" is about as bad as re-using the "strcmp()"
> name to implement a function which copies strings.
I should probably use ilog2() then which would at least be consistent with the
powerpc arch.
> t.c:2: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'log2'
Which, of course, I didn't see because I didn't define it as a function,
merely as a macro.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists