lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:52:01 +0200 From: guest01 <guest01@...il.com> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: OT: calling kernel syscall manually David Woodhouse wrote: > However, the _example_ that the OP gave of this 'third one' was in fact > using the old _syscallX() macros which used to be found in the kernel's > private header files. So I assumed that's what he meant, rather than > open-coding his own inline assembly. > Yes, indeed. I think we should use the _syscallX() macro, but nevertheless I like the inline assembly example :-) So these macros are no longer available in the latest kernel versions? Ok, if that's true, I will use the example with the inline assembler code and write a few lines, that these "macros" are no longer supported. thxs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists