[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0610312000160.5223@poirot.grange>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:02:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tmattox@...il.com, spiky.kiwi@...il.com, r.bhatia@...x.at
Subject: Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known
regressions)
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> :
> [...]
> > The "seems" above was the key word. Once again I had a case, when after
> > re-compiling the kernel again with the disabled call to
> > __rtl8169_set_mac_addr only ping worked. And a power-off was required to
> > recover. So, that phy_reset doesn't seem to be very safe either.
>
> Can you replace phy_reset by the patch below and try it twice ?
>
> It's interesting to know if it does not always behave the same.
Well, with that one I booted 3 times, all 3 times it worked. I'll leave it
in to see if it ever fails. So, what does it tell us about the
set_mac_address thing?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists