linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc1] powerpc: Make of_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1171759045.5644.148.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:37:25 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, johnrose@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, pmac@....ibm.com, Sylvain Munaut <tnt@...tnt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc1] powerpc: Make of_device_uevent()
	compatible	with ibmebus

On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 19:21 -0500, Joachim Fenkes wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote on 17.02.2007 
> 16:56:39:
> 
> > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 17:28 +0100, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
> > > ibmebus has a fake root device that's not associated with an ofdt 
> node.
> > > Filter out any such devices in of_device_uevent().
> > 
> > Doh ! You are creating an of_device with no attached device-node ? That
> > is totally evil ! Why do you need that ?
> 
> The driver creates a fake "ibmebus" device so all ibmebus based devices 
> have
> a common parent device -- the vio bus does the same.
> 
> What do you think about linking this device to the device tree "/" node? 
> All
> ibmebus-based devices are linked to dt nodes residing directly beneath 
> "/",
> so the mapping would fit.

No. If you do that, it shouldn't be an of_device based device.

If you want then to be below a common parent, then create that parent of
a basic struct device type, that sort of thing. You should never
instanciate an of_device that has a NULL device node.

vio is different since it's not a "subclass" of of_device though I tend
to also disagree with the way it does things.

It's a generic problem with sysfs, I agree it somewhat sucks.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/