linux-kernel - Re: thread stacks and strict vm overcommit accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070315110621.9a9defaf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:06:21 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: thread stacks and strict vm overcommit accounting

> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:33:20 +0200 Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This question is relevent to 2.6.20.
> 
> I noticed that if the RSS for the stack size is say, 8MB, running
> a single-threaded process doesn't incur an increase of 8MB to
> Committed_AS (/proc/meminfo).
> 
> However, on multi-threaded apps linked with pthread (on Debian
> Etch with 2.6.20 vanilla x86_64), every thread will incur the
> the specified maximum stack size RSS (assuming that you use
> the default attr). In other words, it appears that vm accounting
> works differently in that case.
> 
> Is this the intended behaviour?

That sounds like a bug to me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/