[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070315110634.a2d08dce.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:06:34 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matt Keenan <tank.en.mate@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: copy_one_pte()
(cc restored. Please always do reply-to-all).
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:35:07 +0000 Matt Keenan <tank.en.mate@...il.com> wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:15:25PM +0100, Zoltan Menyhart wrote:
> >
> >> I had a look at copy_one_pte().
> >> I cannot see any ioproc_update_page() call, not even for the COW pages.
> >> Is it intentional?
> >>
> >
> > There is no such thing as ioproc_update_page in any mainline tree.
> > You must be looking at some vendor tree with braindead patches applied.
> >
> >
> It looks like this function exists as a part of patches to support
> Quadrics NICs / RDMA (HPC platforms). The patches are there so the
> driver doesn't need to pin pages, it can be informed of page updates
> directly. A patch was submitted to l-k sometime in 2005.
Oh Dear.
Which vendor's kernel are we talking about here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists