linux-kernel - sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 May 2007 13:32:38 -0400
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-packagers@...r.kernel.org,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Subject: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:57:52AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> 
> echo 1 > /sys/module/scsi_mod/.../wait_for_async_scans
> 
> somewhere in some script. In fact, the latter method seems simpler,
> saner, better (in every which way)!

Please don't force sysfs on people.  Just watch how it keels over and dies 
when you end up with lots of disks/network interfaces on reasonably sized 
boxes.  16 statically allocated files per network interface starts being 
a problem once you've got a few thousand interfaces.  Anything that forces 
me to use sysfs is not gonna fly.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <zyntrop@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/